We have 2 guests online





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Whole Latte Love!

EspressoTec.Com


Baratza Inc.

Baratza.com - Creators of the Virtuoso!

Transcend Coffee

Home arrow Forum
Welcome to the CoffeeCrew forum for registered users. - feel free to make yourself at home. This forum is dedicated to coffee and espresso based issues.

Forum spammers, scam artists, confidence artists, crooks and obvious commercial shilling is discouraged. Violation of this one simple rule will result in you and your immediate geographical region being banned from the site so do not post ads here! Capiche?

The coffeecrew guestbook and forum has been alive for more than 10 years! Please consider it your one-stop resource for finding out about all things coffee, espresso, specialty coffee and all associated gear and equipment.

We welcome long posts - there is no word limit in fact. Keep in mind that you can only type for 15 to 20 minutes in the forum-post submit window (session timeout)- so consider composing your posts or responses in a text editor - then cut and paste! Thank you and enjoy the forums!

CoffeeCrew.com Discussion Forum and Guestbook  


Level Ground zero landfill initiative - 2008/06/12 14:26 I heard Stacie's Toews interview on CBC this AM and was impressed by the commitment to being ecologically friendly.

One point that struck me as rather odd though is that in order to achieve zero landfill status, Level Ground is in fact burning their coffee bags to recover energy.

The primary bi-product product of burning plastic to produce energy is CO2. One might argue that CO2 emissions are a bigger problem than landfill capacity. It would seem to me that the Carbon in the bags is perhaps best kept in that form. Burying it might be regarded as a form of sequestration, which some are proposing as a technical solution to somewhat mitigate Greenhouse gas emissions.

In addition, plastics as a landfill item, degrade very slowly and produce little or no leachates.

This is a similar argument to use against the use of biofuels. Once the carbon is captured by plants, wouldn't it be best to keep it that way?

I'm not arguing whether landfile or CO2 is the greater issue, however I was wondering if Level ground had made a conscious choice to add to the CO2 problem for the sake of landfill capacity, or whether perhaps that thought had not occurred to them.

Len Ralph
  | | Forum posting/replies are available to registered users.
Powered by Joomlaboard

EspressoTop50.com